Let Not Your Heart Be Hypocritical
Kwanzaa and Christmas
Originally posted in 2013 at my blog and re-posted intermittently in the intervening years. Inevitably, many links from the original post are dead.
Since the creation of Kwanzaa, many have correctly noted that it has no basis in black American history or heritage. For example, its seven core principles all have Swahili names and the Swahili language is predominant in East African countries -- Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, etc. -- but black Americans are almost all descended from West African cultures. (Disclaimer: Despite being one of the rare Americans who does have some East African heritage, I have never celebrated Kwanzaa.)
Some have even opined that the celebration of Kwanzaa is an anathema to Christianity. On this I’m…ahem…agnostic, since Kwanzaa appears to have no religious or spiritual underpinnings -- not unless one counts the religious and spiritual underpinnings of its creator, Dr. Maulana Karenga née Ron Everett.
However, since this black American sub-cultural phenomenon has been dissected and denounced far and wide, I think it’s important to examine aspects of our larger, overarching culture, its traditions, and to know the truth about them.
And so, we turn to Christmas and its questionable foundations.

Nearly all religious scholars agree that Jesus the Christ wasn’t born on December 25th or the equivalent on the Jewish calendar. The reasons? Number one, it was too cold.
Shepherds would not have been in the field at night with their flocks after October. (Luke 2:8)
Romans would not have called for registration requiring travel in December because of the weather. (Matthew 24:20)
At what actual time of year was Jesus born? Follow this timeline and don’t take my word for anything.
Irenaeus, one of the early church fathers (second century A.D.), claimed that Jesus was born in the 41st year of the reign of Augustus Caesar.1 Augustus was born Gaius Octavius and called Octavian. Irenaues counted Augustus’ reign from the second year following the death of the latter’s great-uncle and adoptive father, Julius Caesar (44 B.C.). The principate — “a system of monarchy headed by an emperor holding power for life” -- did not exist until Octavian founded it in 27 B.C., subsequently taking on the name ‘Augustus.’ If that’s so, then Jesus was born in 2 B.C. rather than the generally accepted 4 B.C.
Zacharias, the father of John the Baptist, was a priest in the course of Abijah, which was the eighth course. (Luke 1:1)
Essential knowledge: The priestly caste was organized by King David into 24 courses. The length of each course was seven days, from Shabbat to the next Shabbat. (1 Chronicles 24: 1-19)
The last Jewish Temple was destroyed by Roman military commander Titus -- later Emperor -- during the sacking of Jerusalem on Tish B’Av 3830, which on the Gregorian calendar was August 4, 70 A.D. At this time, the first priestly course had just taken office.
Working backward from the previous two facts, one can see that the end of Zacharias’s course occurred on July 13, 3 B.C. In Luke 1, it is noted that his wife, Elizabeth, became pregnant at that time.
If the birth of John the Baptist occurred anywhere from 271 to 280 days after that, then he was born in early to mid-April of 2 B.C. And according to the Bible, Jesus the Christ was born five months later, in September. We know this because Elizabeth was in her sixth month of pregnancy when Mary -- pregnant with Jesus -- came to visit her (Luke 1:36). Some even think it might have been September 11th. (BTW, the good people at that last link have a slightly different and much more detailed time line than mine.)
So, why do we celebrate Jesus’ birth on December 25th? Here's why.
The first Church experienced hundreds of years of persecution -- first from the Pharisees, then from the Roman Empire. But when Emperor Constantine (of the western part of the empire and who converted himself and his empire to Christianity) and Emperor Licinius (of the eastern part) agreed to the Edict of Milan, Christianity became legal.
Constantine -- who conducted the First Council of Nicaea -- used pagan ideas and practices in order to make the newly condoned celebration of Christ’s birthday more palatable to his mostly pagan subjects. So it is that Christmas falls around the same time as two of pagan Rome's beloved festivals and had taken on the trappings of at least one.
The Saturnalia festival has an astronomical character, referring to the completion of the sun’s yearly course, and the commencement of a new cycle. Saturn, from whom we get the word for the day of the week, Saturday, represented by the sun at its lowest aspect at the winter solstice. The earth is cold, most plants are dead, and it was believed that the sun might also be approaching death. Today winter solstice is around December 21, but because of calendar changes, it was originally December 25th. Saturnalia celebrated the sun overcoming the power of winter, with hope of spring when life would be renewed. In Roman times Bacchus, the god of wine, became the lord of these festivals. (…)
In the Greek myths, Kronos (Saturn) was the Roman Deity of Time and an ancient Italian Corn God known as the Sower. Male ruler of the Roman Gods prior to Jupiter, Saturn's weapon was a scythe or sickle. Kronos was one of the twelve titans. Upon the advice of Gaea (who understood the changes of life and knew that Uranus would never, of his own accord, yield to the younger generation), Saturn castrated his father and thus separated Heaven from Earth. Gaea created out of flint...a mineral of her own substance...a sickle with which to complete the deed. It was the tool by which life was cut down at the time of harvest and was crescent-shaped like the moon, symbolic of cyclic rise and fall. It was believed that the spilled blood of Uranus formed such creatures as the Giants and the Furies, and that his genitals (which were tossed into the sea eventually produced the beautiful Venus/Aphrodite).
Dies Natalis Solis Invicti [removed dead link]
But the actual choice of December 25 for Christmas was thought to have been made under the Emperor Aurelian because this was the date of the Winter Solstice and was the day devotees of Mithras celebrated the dies natalis solis invictus 'birthday of the invincible sun.’
There are two Mithrases [removed dead link]. One has origins in Persia-India; the other is Roman. Whether these are the same entity has long been in dispute. (Side note: Mithras and Saturn sound a whole lot like Osiris.)
Oh and, by the way, early Christians who tried to worship according to the Bible -- that is, without the Saturnalia paraphernalia -- were excommunicated from Constantine’s Roman Church.
And, finally, all the traditions conjured in our minds when we think of Christmas have their origins in various pagan practices.
yule log
mistletoe
Christmas lights
holly
And then there’s this in Jeremiah 10:1-5.
1 Hear ye the word which the Lord speaketh unto you, O house of Israel:
2 Thus saith the Lord, Learn not the way of the heathen, and be not dismayed at the signs of heaven; for the heathen are dismayed at them.
3 For the customs of the people are vain: for one cutteth a tree out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe.
4 They deck it with silver and with gold; they fasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not.
5 They are upright as the palm tree, but speak not: they must needs be borne, because they cannot go. Be not afraid of them; for they cannot do evil, neither also is it in them to do good.
Emphasis mine. I think my point is made.
Now, if people -- Christians specifically -- still want to celebrate the birth of Christ in the traditional manner, I don’t think there’s any harm in it as long as they know what they are doing and have knowledge of the foundations on which they conduct their celebrations. In Hosea 4:6, God said this about another set of His children:
My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children.
Additionally, bashing the foundation of something inconsequential like Kwanzaa while, simultaneously, adorning one's house with the pagan symbols of an empire which did not serve the Living God is hypocritical and, more importantly, spiritually dangerous.
Just saying.
(Thanks to Dr. Chuck Missler (1934-2018), Dr. Gene Scott (1929-2005), and Pastor Melissa Scott.)
Subscribe Free or Paid!
If you would like to make an individual donation:
Thank you for your monetary and prayer support!
Augustus was born Gaius Octavius and called Octavian. Irenaues counted Augustus’ reign from the second year following the death of the latter’s great-uncle and adoptive father, Julius Caesar (44 B.C.). The principate — “a system of monarchy headed by an emperor holding power for life” -- did not exist until Octavian founded it in 27 B.C., subsequently taking on the name ‘Augustus.’



Hi Juliette Akinyi Ochieng.
I read your piece on Kwanzaa and Christmas, fully. While I understand the frustration with the cultural skirmishes around these holidays, there are some significant historical and logical gaps in the argument regarding Christmas that I think are worth correcting.
1. The "Constantine Conspiracy" overlooks Non-Roman History The idea that Christmas was invented by Constantine to appease Roman pagans ignores the rest of the ancient world.
Armenia became the first Christian nation in 301 AD—years before Constantine converted or held the Council of Nicaea. They celebrated the Nativity (Theophany) independently of Roman influence and continue to do so on January 6th.
Ethiopia has celebrated the birth of Christ for over 1,500 years. The Ethiopian Orthodox tradition developed far removed from Roman festivals like Saturnalia. By focusing only on Rome, the essay inadvertently erases the ancient, indigenous Christian traditions of the Near East and Africa, which celebrated the Incarnation without any need to "cover up" Roman paganism.
2. Nicaea and the Date The First Council of Nicaea (325 AD) did not select December 25th or even discuss the date of Christmas. Its records are available, and they focused on the Arian controversy and the date of Easter. The choice of date for Christmas evolved organically over centuries and varies by tradition (as seen with the Armenians and Coptics).
3. The Jeremiah 10 Fallacy Citing Jeremiah 10:1-5 as a prohibition of Christmas trees is a common exegetical error. In context, Jeremiah is describing the construction of an idol: cutting wood, shaping it into a god, and plating it with silver and gold to be worshipped. A decorative tree in a modern home is not a graven image being worshipped as a deity.
4. The "Shepherds" Argument The claim that shepherds wouldn't be out in December is historically debated, not fact. In the mild climate of Judea, sheep destined for Temple sacrifice were often pastured year-round near Bethlehem (Migdal Eder).
The validity of a tradition isn't defined solely by its distant origins, but by its present intent (the Logos). Just as Kwanzaa is meaningful to its practitioners despite its syncretic origins, Christmas is a genuine spiritual celebration of the Incarnation for billions, not a secret worship of Saturn.
Finally, it is completely unbiblical to suggest that all things pagan are evil. All Christians, even "I just read the Bible for myself" have practices that could be called pagan. The Bible does not record "pagan" as "evil."
A look at the history of when the Romans chose their date for Christmas, they acknowledged they were guessing. The real issue wasn't the date to pick, but rather to pick one.
Those who attack a holiday because it's new are off the rails; even Kwanzaa, had it caught on, would not be invalid.
What is being said every time this "Christmas is pagan" motif is that A) all things pagan are evil, and B) Jesus as God allowed and still allows billions of christians for the past 1700 years at least to celebrate his name and his birth wrongly, wickedly. What a pethic idea of God.
It remains that you cannot pick any day of the year--ANY day--that is not on or near a major pagan holiday or festival. If not in Rome, then in China, Japan, India, or anywhere else.
If we look at the history we know the Romans did their best when they chose December 25, though other Christian groups picked other days (January 7 is very popular around the world). That's because everybody understood: the date isn't from the Bible, the point is to pick a day to celebrate, TO COMPETE WITH pagan holidays. So that Christians could honor Jesus without having to feel like they must abandon and curse every single thing in their pre-Christian culture.
Collossians 2:16-17: ""Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day. These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality is Christ."
But there's Juliette Akinyi Ochieng, judging others for keeping festivals. Festivals they have declared to celebrate Jesus.
In every country throughout history, Christians have worked to identify customs that are harmless that Christians can still do. Winter and Spring festivals are found in every culture, but Christians can't have them? Why not? Where'd Jesus say that?
In truth, this "Christmas is pagan" stuff is rooted in contempt for the overwhelming majority of Christians for the last 2000 years. Literally billions of people are getting it wrong because it was placed to coincide and replace existing customs.
And is rooted in the unblical notion that God despises all things pagan, as if "pagan" means "evil."
If you just said "Yeah there used to be a pagan festival here, but they changed it to something to honor Jesus" all the objections would fall away.
Literally, "Christmas is pagan" is based on two ridiculous errors: The idea that pagan=evil and bad, and, the idea that Christians were covering something up when they Christianized their practices.
It is very popular with Fundamentalist Christians who have nothing but contempt for the historical Church--Protestant, Orthodox, and Catholic.
The African Christians in places like Egypt and Ethiopia celebrated Christmas already without Rome's intererence, too. Also the Armenians.
Literally: Atheists love this dodgy set of beliefs because they hate Christianity, and Fundamentalists who "just go by the Bible" are getting their contempt on for anyone who doubts the "Just read it for yourself and you'll be fine" approach to Christianity.
This in the end really did help utterly shatter my faith in the Bible: when you can pull this many contradictory ideas out of it, to the point where Christians slander and attack each other over interpretations, it shows, the Bible's not very clear on many things.
When I was still a Christian, and celebrating things like Christmas, I got mocked, jeered, harassed, and slanderd over and over by Fundamentalists for it. It was abusive, and dishonest....
And even though theoretically I shouldn't care, I still love my real Christian friends enuogh to be willing to defend them from this slander. No, it is NOT a pagan holiday. It is a holiday Christians, doing their best to honor Jesus under the New Covenant, invented. Which is perfectly fine, they all admitted this, it wasn't a secret.
Pagans continued their yule celebrations alongside Christians. Christians, opted to celebrate in their own way instead, incorporating harmless elements (like Christmas trees) as benign traditions. And that is all.
If Christmas is pagan and Jesus hates it, then... it just makes Christianity look ugly, hateful, and irrational.
The fact that these endless attacks on traditional Christianity never end, and are popular among Christian-haters, really does depress me.
But no, Christmas is NOT PAGAN, only people deeply ignorant (and usually hateful) give us this pernicious Christianityi-mocking nonsense.
"Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day. These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality is Christ."
Fundamentalists have no answer for this: they're explicitly going after the direct words of Jesus from the New Testament, condemning people and slandering them. It is a slander not just of Christians; it is ironically even a severe slander of pagans!
Best, Max